|
This is a course in epistemology, the study of what it takes to
know something is true and what it takes to be justified
in believing something is true.
We often pose questions e.g., What percentage of Iraq is
Kurdish? Will the Sixers win tonight? 68+57=? and take ourselves
to know the answers, or to have rational opinions,
or to have good evidence for our views. Rather than answer
these questions directly, we will take a step back and investigate
the nature of evidence, and what it is to know something, or to
be rational. The course will begin by considering some well-known
skeptical challenges to much of what ordinarily take ourselves to
know and/or have justified beliefs about. For instance, some have
thought that our apparent inability to rule out the sort of scenario
described in the movie The Matrix, shows that we don't know
(or even rationally believe) anything about our surroundings. We
will then look at a number of related questions concerning the structure
and nature of knowledge and justification. Does knowledge or justification
have to rest on foundations? Is the standard for what counts as
knowing or being justified higher in, say, the courtroom or epistemology
classroom than in more normal contexts. To know or to be justified
in believing something, do you always have to be in a position to
say how you know or what your grounds are?
Finally, we will examine some particular areas of knowledge, as
time permits, to see what special problems they pose.
- self-knowledge
- scientific knowledge
- memory
- a priori knowledge
- knowledge of right and wrong
|